Accelerated Aging Test Calculator
Calculation Results
Accelerated Aging Factor (AAF): –
Required Test Duration: – Days
Equivalent to – hours in the stability chamber.
Understanding Accelerated Aging Tests
In product development, particularly for medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and electronics, determining the shelf life of a product is critical. However, waiting for two or three years to see how a product degrades is often not feasible. This is where the Accelerated Aging Test comes in.
Accelerated aging is a method that uses increased temperatures to speed up the chemical degradation of materials. By exposing a product to higher temperatures for a shorter period, manufacturers can simulate the effects of long-term storage at ambient temperatures.
The Arrhenius Equation Logic
Most accelerated aging calculations are based on the Arrhenius equation. In practical quality assurance, we use the simplified Q10 factor approach (often referenced in ASTM F1980 for medical device packaging):
- AAF = Q10[(TAA – TRT) / 10]
Where:
- AAF: Accelerated Aging Factor.
- Q10: An aging factor, typically 2.0 for most polymers and medical supplies (meaning the reaction rate doubles for every 10°C increase).
- TAA: Accelerated aging temperature (the temperature in the oven).
- TRT: Real-time storage temperature (usually 20°C or 25°C).
Example Calculation
Suppose you want to validate a 1-year (365 days) shelf life for a product stored at 25°C, and you plan to run your test at 55°C using a Q10 of 2.0.
- Calculate the Temperature Difference: 55°C – 25°C = 30°C.
- Calculate the Exponent: 30 / 10 = 3.
- Calculate the AAF: 2.03 = 8.
- Calculate Test Time: 365 days / 8 = 45.63 days.
This means that keeping the product at 55°C for roughly 46 days is theoretically equivalent to keeping it at 25°C for a full year.
Why is the Q10 Factor Important?
The choice of Q10 is vital for accuracy. While 2.0 is the industry standard for many materials, some chemicals or specialized polymers may have a Q10 ranging from 1.8 to 2.5. Using a factor that is too high may lead to under-testing, while a factor too low results in unnecessarily long testing cycles. Always consult material data sheets or industry standards like ASTM F1980 before finalizing test protocols.